Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
Open Community
Post to this Blog
« December 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Mundane things
stuff
Group One
ASTONISHER WEBSITE
HOMESTARRUNNER.COM
Group Two
Webmonkey Tools
Register Your Domain
Lycos Search
Wired News
Group Three
Lycos Home
Find a Date
Check Stock Quotes
MY LITTLE BLOGGIE
12/30/2004
Um... Do you know the times?
Mood:  incredulous
Hello again, loyal personages!
What is I going to talk about this time? Nothing! No seriously I totally meant to put "Is" instead of "are" in that last sentence.
My birthday is coming up! I'm going to hopefully have a couple of persons over! It'll be fun! And I'm getting some money that I can use either to buy a better digital camera, or save for my laptop that I'm eventually going to get. I'm almost leaning toward the camera. Seeing as I'm going to get a summer job (hopefully) I'll be able to make more money than I'll need, so the money that I save now won't matter that much anyway. I don't know though. I can get a good HP camera for about $70. It's 2.1 megipixel, but it actually takes really good pictures! Our 2 megipixel Kodak takes fab pictures. As I was told by my friend Riley, who does wedding photography, megapixels aren't that important. If you have 8 megapixels, you can print a photo in good quality about the size of one of those posters of Orlando Bloom that you see in Toys"R"Us I'm not planning on printing posters, so really all I need is 2 or 3. Not 1.3 though. That's what mine is, and it's awful. It's got a plastic lens too, so there you are...
Okay, lata... -k

Posted by ME at 8:52 PM CST
Post Comment | View Comments (7) | Permalink

Comments Page

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment

01/05/2005 - 5:28 PM CST

Name: The Riley
Home Page: http://www.rileyspiller.com

I'm afraid I must interject -- not that I actually MUST, I'm just inclined to -- as I've moved my general recommendation for the minimum specs of a digital camera from 2 to 3 megapixel. Pretty much the largest full quality photo a 2mp can print is a 5x7 (desktop size) photo. On the other hand a 3mp can print up to an 8x10 (a wall sized print). That said, a good digital camera IMO is all about the exposure, color, and features.

Keep up the bloggin!

Reply to this Comment
Comments Page
View Latest Entries